| The Daily Mining Gazette - Published: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 |
Print
Article | Close Window |
|
Scholar to view local artifacts
By STACEY ASHCRAFT, DMG Writer
HOUGHTON
— Humans have long marveled over ancient stone carvings, known as
petroglyphs, which may showcase the activities and lifestyles of those
who lived hundreds, and even thousands, of years ago.
These
rare, unique and intricate images, often of people wielding spears and
bound animals, are familiar among rock art, each giving a mere glimpse
into what the past may have been like.
One Michigan anthropologist has extensively studied these carvings professionally and is bringing his work to the U.P.
John
Norder, assistant professor of anthropology at Michigan State
University will speak at Michigan Technological University at 4 p.m.
Friday in Dow 642 about rock art in the Great Lakes region.
The visit comes shortly after several area residents reported findings and evidence of rock carvings on their property.
“I’m
going to talk to the public to educate people about rock art,” he said.
“I’ll talk to people who are finding petroglyphs and I’ll attempt to
verify them.”
In his speech, titled “Talking to the Spirit,
Talking to Each Other: Ancient Pictography of the Great Lakes,” Norder
will explain the phenomenon of petroglyphs and communication. Using
explanations from his previous research, Norder plans to look in-depth
at area sites and attempt to answer the fundamental question of “what
does it all mean?”
“Area residents will be able to bring photographs of their findings to me and I’ll examine them," he said.
There are only a few known petroglyph sites in Michigan, one being the Sanilac Petroglyphs the Thumb of the state.
Susan
Martin, associate professor of anthropology at Tech, said stone
carvings are not common but are occasionally encountered all over the
world.
“They aren’t always immediately discernible to an
ordinary observer and sometimes they’re covered with lichen or the
rocks are weathered so it’s not always apparent what they are,” she
said.
Martin said only an expert can determine which findings are valid differing them from older graffiti-type markings.
Recently,
she said people have been calling Tech about their findings. In the
past 10 years, Martin said she believes to have received about five
reports of findings. It isn’t easy to confirm whether the findings are
valid because of natural processes, such as differential erosion
involving soft and hard rocks, she said.
More likely, findings
that appear to be ancient stone carvings may in fact be evidence left
behind from historic farmers or 19th century people, for example, she
said.
“Before you jump the the greatest conclusion of all — that
it reveals something about prehistory — you need to rule out all other
possible sources,” she said. “As scientists, we have to rule out all
the more likely explanations so the least likely one stands with
strength.”
Petroglyphs are made by people pecking away at a soft
rock with a harder rock or implement, removing soft stone in a pattern,
she said.
Though visually descriptive, petroglyphs are often
hard to depict because of the different types of ethnicity groups who
make them and what that picture represents in their culture, Martin
said.
“They can represent incredible time spans and they can
also represent lots of different people — different language groups,
different ethnicities,” she said.
Martin said, for example, if a
person saw a carving of a man with a spear in his hand, it’s easy to
make the judgment that the picture is about someone hunting, and that’s
not always true.
Finding stone carvings in the area may not
change history, but more so act as puzzle pieces that give insight as
to how people lived in the past.
“They are unusual because they
are deliberate, they’re deliberately made,” she said. “Unlike finding a
piece of pottery or finding an arrowhead, something that was
accidentally discarded or broken, these things were intentionally made.”
|
|
|